D-5
BATS
PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF WILDLIFE DAMAGE — 1994
Coop erat ive Extension Division
Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources
University of Nebraska - Lincoln
United States Department of Agriculture
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Animal Damage Control
Great Plains Agricultural Council
Wildlife Committee
Damage Prevention and
Control Methods
Exclusion
Polypropylene netting checkvalves
simplify getting bats out.
Quality bat-proofing permanently
excludes bats.
Initiate control before young are born
or after they are able to fly.
Repellents
Naphthalene: limited efficacy.
Illu mination.
Air drafts/ventilation.
Ultrasonic devices: not effective.
Sticky deterrents: limited efficacy.
Toxicants
None are registered.
Trapping
Available, but unnecessarily
complicated compared to exclusion
and bat-proofing.
Other Methods
Sanitation and cleanup.
Artificial roosts.
Removal of Occasional Bat
Intruders
When no bite or contact has occurred,
help the bat escape (otherwise
submit it for rabies testing).
Conservation and Public Education
Information itself functions as a
management technique.
Arthur M. Greenhall
Research Associate
Department of Mammalogy
American Museum of Natural History
New York, New York 10024
Stephen C. Frantz
Vertebrate Vector Specialist
Wadsworth Center for Laboratories
and Research
New York State Department of Health
Albany, New York 12201-0509
Fig. 1. Little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus